ES · EN

FARO · Transparency

The state of the truth

The system’s global numbers, calculated from the same signals you see in the app. Honest context: good analysts win 55–65% of the time — be wary of anyone who promises more.
What this page publishes

The total number of signals published and closed on the platform —closed at the stop, at the target, at the time limit for the asset class or by an early close by the one who published them, and labeled “Closed by hand” in their timeline when the close is decided by a person because the engine could not measure the level or its sources do not agree—, how many were canceled or never triggered, the aggregate win rate with its sample size, how many analysts are active and how many verified, and what share of the signals discloses a conflict of interest.

The figures are not written on this page: they are calculated in the browser from the real signals at the moment you look at them. A number frozen in a static file would stop being true a minute later, and this is a page about not lying with numbers.

Why it exists

Any platform can claim that its analysts win. FARO publishes the complete aggregate —losses and closes at the stop included— because the track record is the product. In the industry that is the exception: we analyzed 25 Spanish-language signal channels and none of them publishes the result of all its trades, not even as an aggregate summary. Signals are sealed: once 5 minutes have passed since publication, they cannot be edited or deleted from the app, and any exceptional administrative intervention is recorded and detectable.

The rules used to calculate each number are published in the methodology, with the exact formulas. And turned into a practical checklist to evaluate any analyst or channel —from here or anywhere else—, in the guide how to tell if a trader is reliable: 7 checks.